What Vaccines Should Family Get to Be Around Newborn

March 02, 2022 Post a Comment

Update January 7, 2022: The numbers in the Denmark study described beneath are now confirmed past regime data from Germany showing that vaccinated people are 8X more than likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the same thing: the more you lot vaccinate, the worse it gets.

Worried most Omicron? Gauge what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to make you MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you'll go far for the virus.

In short, we've been lied to about the vaccine. Information technology is protecting y'all less and less over time. While yous may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to exist negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, simply at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

These vaccines may help you win the state of war against a variant that may soon exist rare, but the cost yous pay is that you brand your immunity to everything else worse. It's a impaired tradeoff (particularly since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe any of the scientific discipline referenced in this article, and so information technology volition continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game irresolute tweet about a study in Kingdom of denmark which instantly went viral as you can see from the number of retweets:

I want to tell you lot what this really means and how information technology is being attacked.

Summary: Refuse to comply with mandates. Now.

This newspaper means we volition need to inject people every 30 days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the impairment that the vaccines do to our immune organization, it'due south probable that the needed interval volition shorten with each booster.

If people don't get boosted as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That'due south what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn't mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It ways the Contrary of what you were told: information technology means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (past suppressing your immune organization, probably permanently each time we are injected co-ordinate to Dr. Ryan Cole). It ways nosotros were lied to.

In short, the vaccine is similar a heroin addiction: once y'all've had a taste of it, you lot are hooked: you lot have to proceed information technology for life if y'all want protection. If you stop it, you're a sitting duck for the virus.

What'south worse is our regime is mandating this now. In low-cal of this newspaper, they will change the vaccine mandates to forcefulness you lot to get vaccinated every calendar month or you will be fired from your job. Their next motility could well be to brand information technology illegal non to be vaccinated. This seems similar where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are apace stripping away your rights to do anything without a vaccination.

And we have no clue what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination will do to your body. This has never been tested.

My advice is elementary. If you have been vaccinated, you need to terminate at present. Do non become the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is fond of repeating the old adage, "When you lot find yourself in a hole, stop earthworks ."

Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their jobs, so they will go vaccinated and medical professionals will non speak out since doing and then will cause them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower toll style to stop the pandemic

Anybody needs to stop listening to the CDC now and start listening to people who have been saying to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.

The entire pandemic will end as soon as the CDC stops ignoring the existing early treatment protocols which have been available since March 2020 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was showtime bachelor back then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could have (and yet can) stop the hospitalization and death with but one affair: early handling. Just similar Nihon has done. But the CDC refused to mind.

What the paper said in detail

First, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the newspaper. The current version can exist constitute here.

Starting time at the comments, both from social media and likewise from medrxiv readers.

Check out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

And then assume the results you like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but hand wave confounders at results you don't like (negative VE for distant vaccination)? Science?
This is a superb paper, specially the conscientious arroyo to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.
Looking at the graphs, I encounter both vaccines lose all effectiveness at ninety days, simply worse, actually drop into stiff negative effectiveness after that time.

This would hateful that these vaccines *increase* 1's chances of infection afterward the initial 90 days "honeymoon" period.

Am I getting this right?

If so, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The central material is in the total PDF:

The graphs higher up tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not you.

So at 60 days, the protection is close to zilch, so if y'all want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune system and then it is already "geared up" to fight the virus. That's not what a vaccine is supposed to do.

Furthermore, the negative VE later on ninety days means you are hooked for life and I would estimate (based on the machinery of action), that nosotros will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster yous go (since it kills off your allowed system every time).

And then it could very well be monthly boosters after the 2nd dose, weekly boosters after the 3rd dose, and peradventure daily boosters after the quaternary dose to maintain your "amnesty."

You tin't stop after that because if you lot stop, you're in worse shape than if you never started.

The stunning decision of the newspaper

In light of the exponential ascent in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the demand for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their report means.

They also wrote this (which is purely speculative with no information behind it as noted in the italics were my improver):

The negative estimates in the final period arguably advise different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through unmarried (super-spreading) events causing many infections amongst young, vaccinated individuals.

This newspaper should be a wake up phone call: the vaccines do not work. Finish repeating the insanity.

Early treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X ameliorate than any new therapy, they don't "hook you lot," and they don't cause disability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd have near no deaths, and few hospitalizations. Merely they can't do that since medical board will have away the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are decadent and incompetent and they will not hold themselves accountable in an open up argue. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine infinite… it's nix new. The book "Evidence of impairment" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental similar reporters are supposed to be), just any neutral thinking person will side against the authorities.

Why the paper went viral

So, the reason this paper went viral is considering

Information technology is well done,
It was done by PhDs in communicable diseases and epidemiology,
The results show what is really happening, and
Nobody has been able to attack the paper with a apparent argument, even on Twitter.
It confirms what my team of experts has been maxim nigh negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the paper:

Supporting testify

The newspaper isn't a fluke. At that place is lots of other bear witness in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative explanation for it).

Here's the information from Canada which shows that nosotros accept it backwards. We should be mandating "no vaccines" in order to go along your job and fire all the vaccinated people because these people are the most risky.

In Ontario in the concluding few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated accept skyrocketed higher up cases per capita among the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire instance for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed college per capita infection charge per unit.

Here'southward the United kingdom data showing the same thing. We need to flip effectually the mandates ASAP.

Other supporting data:

On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative office in deaths after vaccination and the video about that paper. If the vaccines don't impale you, they will leave you weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated after vaccination were found to have been caused by the vaccines. In that location is no other explanation.
The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
An fantabulous article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why nosotros are seeing the result that the more you vaccinate, the more than you lot make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate immune systems.
Vaccine efficacy declines to be negative in the Great britain (Expose article)
Booster protection fades within 10 weeks against Omicron: UK study
Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for about 10 weeks, report finds — which could mean more than doses for some in 2022
This substack article looks at the Danish study (described hither) and the UK information. Notation that the VE numbers in the two studies are different considering if yous separate our Omicron, you get a very different flick of VE compared to analyses that don't separate out VE past variant.
Dr. Ron Brownish – Opinion Editorial

December 23, 2021

Ontario, Canada reported five,790 new COVID-19 cases on Thursday, December 23, 2021, setting the province's one-twenty-four hour period record for new cases since the beginning of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-xix. Th's numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to 4,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a speedily rising tendency over the past several weeks clearly showing that most new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.